Japan Transportation
Japan JP: Air Transport: Freight
JP: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 10,684.574 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 9,360.888 Ton-km mn for 2016. JP: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 5,746.050 Ton-km mn from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10,684.574 Ton-km mn in 2017 and a record low of 379.600 Ton-km mn in 1970. JP: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 9,360.89 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Air Transport: Freight from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
JP: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 123,898,000.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 117,708,000.000 Person for 2016. JP: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 82,645,952.000 Person from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 123,898,000.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 16,315,100.000 Person in 1970. JP: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 117,706,000.00 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
JP: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 1,035,522.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 984,320.000 Unit for 2016. JP: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 492,550.000 Unit from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,035,522.000 Unit in 2017 and a record low of 277,300.000 Unit in 1970. JP: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 984,302.81 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
JP: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 5.000 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 5.000 NA for 2016. JP: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 4.800 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.100 NA in 2014 and a record low of 4.341 NA in 2008. JP: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5.00 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Japan JP: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
JP: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 21,904,443.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 20,784,617.000 TEU for 2016. JP: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 19,054,064.000 TEU from Dec 2000 (Median) to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 21,904,443.000 TEU in 2017 and a record low of 13,100,000.000 TEU in 2000. JP: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 20,257,000.00 2016 | yearly | 2000 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2000 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
JP: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 78.900 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 68.820 NA for 2015. JP: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 66.630 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 78.900 NA in 2016 and a record low of 62.140 NA in 2014. JP: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 78.90 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 4.030 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.952 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 4.030 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.130 NA in 2010 and a record low of 3.952 NA in 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.03 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 3.990 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.932 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 3.990 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.120 NA in 2007 and a record low of 3.932 NA in 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.99 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 3.695 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.518 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.610 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.770 NA in 2007 and a record low of 3.518 NA in 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.69 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 3.848 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.781 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 3.790 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.848 NA in 2016 and a record low of 3.720 NA in 2012. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.85 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 4.207 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.239 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 4.239 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.340 NA in 2007 and a record low of 4.207 NA in 2016. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.21 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 3.970 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.915 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 3.970 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.020 NA in 2007 and a record low of 3.915 NA in 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.97 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 4.097 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 4.155 NA for 2014. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 4.110 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.190 NA in 2010 and a record low of 4.097 NA in 2016. JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.10 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
JP: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.880 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.100 USD for 2014. JP: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.900 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.610 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.660 USD in 2002. JP: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
JP: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.060 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.380 USD for 2014. JP: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.250 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.000 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.910 USD in 2002. JP: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
JP: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 5.300 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 5.400 NA for 2016. JP: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 5.221 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.548 NA in 2007 and a record low of 5.153 NA in 2010. JP: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5.30 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Japan JP: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km
JP: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data was reported at 15,108.400 km in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 16,704.400 km for 2015. JP: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data is updated yearly, averaging 20,161.500 km from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2016, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23,371.000 km in 1982 and a record low of 15,108.400 km in 2016. JP: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Rail lines are the length of railway route available for train service, irrespective of the number of parallel tracks.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Sum; Aggregates are based on gap-filled data.
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 15,108.40 2016 | yearly | 1980 - 2016 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km from 1980 to 2016 in the chart:
Japan JP: Railways: Goods Transported
JP: Railways: Goods Transported data was reported at 20,255.000 Ton-km mn in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 20,255.000 Ton-km mn for 2013. JP: Railways: Goods Transported data is updated yearly, averaging 22,681.000 Ton-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2014, with 35 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 37,000.000 Ton-km mn in 1980 and a record low of 19,945.000 Ton-km mn in 1986. JP: Railways: Goods Transported data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Goods transported by railway are the volume of goods transported by railway, measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 20,255.00 2014 | yearly | 1980 - 2014 |
View Japan's Japan JP: Railways: Goods Transported from 1980 to 2014 in the chart:
Japan JP: Railways: Passengers Carried
JP: Railways: Passengers Carried data was reported at 206,722.000 Person-km mn in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 255,881.000 Person-km mn for 2014. JP: Railways: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 241,730.000 Person-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2015, with 36 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 260,014.000 Person-km mn in 2013 and a record low of 190,767.000 Person-km mn in 1982. JP: Railways: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Japan – Table JP.World Bank: Transportation. Passengers carried by railway are the number of passengers transported by rail times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 206,722.00 2015 | yearly | 1980 - 2015 |