Rwanda Transportation
Rwanda RW: Air Transport: Freight
RW: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 20.696 Ton-km mn in 2014. This records an increase from the previous number of 19.999 Ton-km mn for 2013. RW: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 5.418 Ton-km mn from Dec 1982 to 2014, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 20.696 Ton-km mn in 2014 and a record low of 1.200 Ton-km mn in 1991. RW: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 20.70 2014 | yearly | 1982 - 2014 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Air Transport: Freight from 1982 to 2014 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
RW: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 739,674.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 644,559.000 Person for 2016. RW: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 10,100.000 Person from Dec 1981 to 2017, with 22 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 739,674.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 4,300.000 Person in 1986. RW: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 739,674.00 2017 | yearly | 1981 - 2017 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1981 to 2017 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
RW: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 4,593.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4,314.000 Unit for 2016. RW: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 3,302.500 Unit from Dec 1981 to 2017, with 22 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 12,096.000 Unit in 2014 and a record low of 500.000 Unit in 1994. RW: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4,593.00 2017 | yearly | 1981 - 2017 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1981 to 2017 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
RW: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 5.300 NA in 2017. This stayed constant from the previous number of 5.300 NA for 2016. RW: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 5.300 NA from Dec 2010 to 2017, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5.600 NA in 2012 and a record low of 4.812 NA in 2010. RW: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 5.30 2017 | yearly | 2010 - 2017 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2010 to 2017 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 3.040 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.939 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.390 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.040 NA in 2016 and a record low of 1.600 NA in 2007. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.04 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 2.868 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.639 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 2.060 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.868 NA in 2016 and a record low of 1.670 NA in 2007. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.87 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 3.053 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.777 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.777 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.053 NA in 2016 and a record low of 1.670 NA in 2007. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.05 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 2.933 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.500 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 2.190 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.933 NA in 2016 and a record low of 1.630 NA in 2010. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.93 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 3.352 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.339 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 2.760 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.352 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.050 NA in 2010. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.35 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 2.986 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.759 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 2.270 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.986 NA in 2016 and a record low of 1.770 NA in 2007. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.99 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 2.622 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.322 NA for 2014. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 1.880 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.622 NA in 2016 and a record low of 1.530 NA in 2007. RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.62 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
RW: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.130 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.410 USD for 2014. RW: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.035 USD from Dec 1991 to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.730 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.720 USD in 1998. RW: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.13 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
RW: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.170 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.410 USD for 2014. RW: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.045 USD from Dec 1991 to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.730 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.720 USD in 1998. RW: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Rwanda's Rwanda RW: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Rwanda RW: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
RW: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 2.900 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.300 NA for 2016. RW: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 3.318 NA from Dec 2010 to 2017, with 8 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.600 NA in 2014 and a record low of 2.812 NA in 2010. RW: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Rwanda – Table RW.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.90 2017 | yearly | 2010 - 2017 |