Jordan Transportation
Jordan JO: Air Transport: Freight
JO: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 158.955 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 144.211 Ton-km mn for 2016. JO: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 172.048 Ton-km mn from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 296.600 Ton-km mn in 1996 and a record low of 1.200 Ton-km mn in 1970. JO: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 144.21 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Air Transport: Freight from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
JO: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 3,381,677.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 3,181,283.000 Person for 2016. JO: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 1,275,998.500 Person from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,438,356.000 Person in 2012 and a record low of 118,800.000 Person in 1970. JO: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3,181,283.00 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
JO: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 36,946.000 Unit in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 38,161.000 Unit for 2016. JO: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 15,950.000 Unit from Dec 1970 (Median) to 2017, with 48 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 40,329.198 Unit in 2011 and a record low of 4,100.000 Unit in 1972. JO: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table JO.World Bank: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 38,161.00 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
JO: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 4.800 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.500 NA for 2016. JO: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 4.500 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.800 NA in 2017 and a record low of 4.345 NA in 2007. JO: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.80 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
JO: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 796,087.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 767,000.000 TEU for 2016. JO: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 767,000.000 TEU from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 873,000.000 TEU in 2013 and a record low of 414,000.000 TEU in 2007. JO: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 777,516.00 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
JO: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 29.270 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 26.150 NA for 2015. JO: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 17.790 NA from Dec 2004 (Median) to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 29.270 NA in 2016 and a record low of 11.000 NA in 2004. JO: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 29.27 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 2.958 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.667 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.667 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.958 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.330 NA in 2010. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.96 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 2.891 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.939 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 2.891 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 NA in 2007 and a record low of 2.170 NA in 2012. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.89 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 3.174 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.956 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.080 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.174 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.880 NA in 2012. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.17 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 2.553 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.596 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 2.553 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.620 NA in 2007 and a record low of 2.270 NA in 2012. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.55 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 3.340 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.460 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 3.340 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.460 NA in 2014 and a record low of 2.920 NA in 2012. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.34 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 2.957 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.874 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 2.874 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.957 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.560 NA in 2012. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.96 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 2.775 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 2.590 NA for 2014. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 2.620 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.775 NA in 2016 and a record low of 2.480 NA in 2012. JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.77 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
JO: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.640 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.820 USD for 2014. JO: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.450 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.970 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.150 USD in 2000. JO: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
JO: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.100 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.270 USD for 2014. JO: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.610 USD from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2016, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.440 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.400 USD in 1995. JO: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.10 2016 | yearly | 1995 - 2016 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1995 to 2016 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
JO: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 4.500 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.000 NA for 2016. JO: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 4.381 NA from Dec 2007 (Median) to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.514 NA in 2009 and a record low of 3.995 NA in 2015. JO: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.50 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km
JO: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data was reported at 509.000 km in 2014. This records an increase from the previous number of 508.200 km for 2013. JO: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data is updated yearly, averaging 293.000 km from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2014, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 509.000 km in 2014 and a record low of 251.000 km in 2008. JO: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Rail lines are the length of railway route available for train service, irrespective of the number of parallel tracks.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Sum; Aggregates are based on gap-filled data.
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 509.00 2014 | yearly | 1980 - 2014 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Rail Lines: Total Route-Km from 1980 to 2014 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Railways: Goods Transported
JO: Railways: Goods Transported data was reported at 344.000 Ton-km mn in 2014. This records a decrease from the previous number of 344.100 Ton-km mn for 2013. JO: Railways: Goods Transported data is updated yearly, averaging 622.000 Ton-km mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2014, with 34 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,024.000 Ton-km mn in 2005 and a record low of 198.000 Ton-km mn in 2004. JO: Railways: Goods Transported data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Goods transported by railway are the volume of goods transported by railway, measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 344.00 2014 | yearly | 1980 - 2014 |
View Jordan's Jordan JO: Railways: Goods Transported from 1980 to 2014 in the chart:
Jordan JO: Railways: Passengers Carried
JO: Railways: Passengers Carried data was reported at 503.000 Person-km mn in 2014. This records a decrease from the previous number of 503.537 Person-km mn for 2013. JO: Railways: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 503.769 Person-km mn from Dec 2011 (Median) to 2014, with 4 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 504.000 Person-km mn in 2012 and a record low of 503.000 Person-km mn in 2014. JO: Railways: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Jordan – Table JO.World Bank: Transportation. Passengers carried by railway are the number of passengers transported by rail times kilometers traveled.; ; Internation Union of Railways (UIC); Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 503.00 2014 | yearly | 2011 - 2014 |