Hong Kong SAR, China Transportation
Hong Kong HK: Air Transport: Freight
HK: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 12,415.199 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 11,409.119 Ton-km mn for 2016. HK: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 8,985.895 Ton-km mn from Dec 1997 to 2017, with 21 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 13,293.176 Ton-km mn in 2009 and a record low of 2,325.300 Ton-km mn in 1997. HK: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 11,409.12 2016 | yearly | 1997 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Air Transport: Freight from 1997 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
HK: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 45,580,297.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 43,683,583.000 Person for 2016. HK: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 23,973,030.000 Person from Dec 1997 to 2017, with 21 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 45,580,297.000 Person in 2017 and a record low of 5,957,200.000 Person in 1997. HK: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 43,454,423.34 2016 | yearly | 1997 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1997 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
HK: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 243,518.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 235,581.000 Unit for 2016. HK: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 158,255.000 Unit from Dec 1991 to 2017, with 27 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 243,518.000 Unit in 2017 and a record low of 72,400.000 Unit in 1999. HK: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 235,385.17 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
HK: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 6.000 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 6.200 NA for 2016. HK: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 6.100 NA from Dec 2007 to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 6.470 NA in 2010 and a record low of 5.943 NA in 2008. HK: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong SAR – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 6.00 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
HK: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 20,770,000.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 19,580,000.000 TEU for 2016. HK: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 22,601,630.000 TEU from Dec 2005 to 2017, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 24,494,229.000 TEU in 2008 and a record low of 19,580,000.000 TEU in 2016. HK: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong SAR – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 19,580,000.00 2016 | yearly | 2005 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2005 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
HK: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 101.020 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 116.760 NA for 2015. HK: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 108.780 NA from Dec 2004 to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 117.180 NA in 2012 and a record low of 94.420 NA in 2004. HK: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 101.02 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 4.028 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.871 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 4.028 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.090 NA in 2012 and a record low of 3.871 NA in 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.03 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 4.000 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.809 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 3.990 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.080 NA in 2012 and a record low of 3.809 NA in 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.00 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 4.055 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.580 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 3.780 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.180 NA in 2012 and a record low of 3.580 NA in 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong SAR – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.05 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 3.938 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.724 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 3.840 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.970 NA in 2012 and a record low of 3.724 NA in 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.94 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 4.290 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 4.061 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 4.280 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.330 NA in 2007 and a record low of 4.040 NA in 2010. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong SAR – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.29 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 4.069 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.827 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.120 NA in 2012 and a record low of 3.827 NA in 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.07 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 4.103 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 3.972 NA for 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 4.060 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.120 NA in 2012 and a record low of 3.972 NA in 2014. HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 4.10 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
HK: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.420 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.560 USD for 2014. HK: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.030 USD from Dec 1991 to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.570 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.570 USD in 1991. HK: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong SAR – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
HK: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 1.860 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.060 USD for 2014. HK: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 1.615 USD from Dec 1991 to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.160 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.820 USD in 1991. HK: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong SAR – Table HK.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1.86 2016 | yearly | 1991 - 2016 |
View Hong Kong SAR, China's Hong Kong HK: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1991 to 2016 in the chart:
Hong Kong HK: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
HK: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 6.500 NA in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 6.400 NA for 2016. HK: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 6.540 NA from Dec 2007 to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 6.817 NA in 2010 and a record low of 6.352 NA in 2015. HK: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Hong Kong – Table HK.World Bank: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 6.50 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |