Guatemala Transportation
Guatemala GT: Air Transport: Freight
GT: Air Transport: Freight data was reported at 0.546 Ton-km mn in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.632 Ton-km mn for 2016. GT: Air Transport: Freight data is updated yearly, averaging 6.350 Ton-km mn from Dec 1970 to 2017, with 38 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 44.300 Ton-km mn in 1997 and a record low of 0.000 Ton-km mn in 2013. GT: Air Transport: Freight data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air freight is the volume of freight, express, and diplomatic bags carried on each flight stage (operation of an aircraft from takeoff to its next landing), measured in metric tons times kilometers traveled.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.63 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Air Transport: Freight from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Air Transport: Passengers Carried
GT: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data was reported at 155,524.000 Person in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 111,830.000 Person for 2016. GT: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data is updated yearly, averaging 119,000.000 Person from Dec 1970 to 2017, with 37 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 508,400.000 Person in 1997 and a record low of 43,000.000 Person in 1973. GT: Air Transport: Passengers Carried data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Air passengers carried include both domestic and international aircraft passengers of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 111,830.00 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Air Transport: Passengers Carried from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide
GT: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data was reported at 3,577.000 Unit in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 3,102.000 Unit for 2016. GT: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data is updated yearly, averaging 3,577.000 Unit from Dec 1970 to 2017, with 37 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 10,500.000 Unit in 1970 and a record low of 1,800.000 Unit in 1986. GT: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under World Trend Plus’s Association: Aviation Sector – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Registered carrier departures worldwide are domestic takeoffs and takeoffs abroad of air carriers registered in the country.; ; International Civil Aviation Organization, Civil Aviation Statistics of the World and ICAO staff estimates.; Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3,102.00 2016 | yearly | 1970 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Air Transport: Registered Carrier Departures Worldwide from 1970 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient
GT: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data was reported at 3.200 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.500 NA for 2016. GT: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data is updated yearly, averaging 3.900 NA from Dec 2007 to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.344 NA in 2008 and a record low of 3.200 NA in 2017. GT: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Burden of Customs Procedure measures business executives' perceptions of their country's efficiency of customs procedures. The rating ranges from 1 to 7, with a higher score indicating greater efficiency. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Respondents evaluated the efficiency of customs procedures in their country. The lowest score (1) rates the customs procedure as extremely inefficient, and the highest score (7) as extremely efficient.; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report and data files.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.20 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Burden of Customs Procedure: WEF: 1=Extremely Inefficient To 7=Extremely Efficient from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units)
GT: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data was reported at 1,390,000.000 TEU in 2017. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,300,025.000 TEU for 2016. GT: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data is updated yearly, averaging 921,984.000 TEU from Dec 2000 to 2017, with 18 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1,470,200.000 TEU in 2015 and a record low of 322,136.000 TEU in 2001. GT: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Port container traffic measures the flow of containers from land to sea transport modes., and vice versa, in twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs), a standard-size container. Data refer to coastal shipping as well as international journeys. Transshipment traffic is counted as two lifts at the intermediate port (once to off-load and again as an outbound lift) and includes empty units.; ; UNCTAD (http://unctad.org/en/Pages/statistics.aspx); Sum;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 1,470,101.00 2016 | yearly | 2000 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Container Port Traffic: TEU (20 Foot Equivalent Units) from 2000 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100
GT: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data was reported at 20.300 NA in 2016. This records an increase from the previous number of 20.270 NA for 2015. GT: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data is updated yearly, averaging 18.130 NA from Dec 2004 to 2016, with 13 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 21.170 NA in 2014 and a record low of 12.280 NA in 2004. GT: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Liner Shipping Connectivity Index captures how well countries are connected to global shipping networks. It is computed by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) based on five components of the maritime transport sector: number of ships, their container-carrying capacity, maximum vessel size, number of services, and number of companies that deploy container ships in a country's ports. For each component a country's value is divided by the maximum value of each component in 2004, the five components are averaged for each country, and the average is divided by the maximum average for 2004 and multiplied by 100. The index generates a value of 100 for the country with the highest average index in 2004. . The underlying data come from Containerisation International Online.; ; United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Review of Maritime Transport 2010.; ;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 20.30 2016 | yearly | 2004 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Liner Shipping Connectivity Index: Maximum Value In 2004 = 100 from 2004 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data was reported at 2.457 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.683 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.683 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.800 NA in 2012 and a record low of 2.430 NA in 2007. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.46 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ability to Track and Trace Consignments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data was reported at 2.297 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.683 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data is updated yearly, averaging 2.683 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.780 NA in 2012 and a record low of 2.297 NA in 2016. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the overall level of competence and quality of logistics services (e.g. transport operators, customs brokers), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.30 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Competence and Quality of Logistics Services from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data was reported at 2.412 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.869 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data is updated yearly, averaging 2.620 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.869 NA in 2014 and a record low of 2.160 NA in 2010. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed the ease of arranging competitively priced shipments to markets, on a rating ranging from 1 (very difficult) to 5 (very easy). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.41 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Ease of Arranging Competitively Priced Shipments from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data was reported at 2.472 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.750 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data is updated yearly, averaging 2.472 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.750 NA in 2014 and a record low of 2.270 NA in 2007. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated efficiency of customs clearance processes (i.e. speed, simplicity and predictability of formalities), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.47 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Efficiency of Customs Clearance Process from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data was reported at 2.984 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.239 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data is updated yearly, averaging 3.230 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.520 NA in 2010 and a record low of 2.984 NA in 2016. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents assessed how often the shipments to assessed markets reach the consignee within the scheduled or expected delivery time, on a rating ranging from 1 (hardly ever) to 5 (nearly always). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.98 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Frequency with which Shipments Reach Consignee within Scheduled or Expected Time from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data was reported at 2.476 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.797 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data is updated yearly, averaging 2.630 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.800 NA in 2012 and a record low of 2.476 NA in 2016. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank: Transportation. Logistics Performance Index overall score reflects perceptions of a country's logistics based on efficiency of customs clearance process, quality of trade- and transport-related infrastructure, ease of arranging competitively priced shipments, quality of logistics services, ability to track and trace consignments, and frequency with which shipments reach the consignee within the scheduled time. The index ranges from 1 to 5, with a higher score representing better performance. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Scores for the six areas are averaged across all respondents and aggregated to a single score using principal components analysis. Details of the survey methodology and index construction methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010).; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.48 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Overall from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure
GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data was reported at 2.201 NA in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.536 NA for 2014. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data is updated yearly, averaging 2.370 NA from Dec 2007 to 2016, with 5 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.590 NA in 2012 and a record low of 2.130 NA in 2007. GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the quality of trade and transport related infrastructure (e.g. ports, railroads, roads, information technology), on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.; ; World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 2.20 2016 | yearly | 2007 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Logistics Performance Index: 1=Low To 5=High: Quality of Trade and Transport-Related Infrastructure from 2007 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter
GT: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.650 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.900 USD for 2014. GT: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.635 USD from Dec 1992 to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.040 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.250 USD in 1992. GT: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of diesel fuel. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.65 2016 | yearly | 1992 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Pump Price for Diesel Fuel: USD per Liter from 1992 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter
GT: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data was reported at 0.790 USD in 2016. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.010 USD for 2014. GT: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data is updated yearly, averaging 0.730 USD from Dec 1992 to 2016, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 1.140 USD in 2012 and a record low of 0.320 USD in 1992. GT: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank: Transportation. Fuel prices refer to the pump prices of the most widely sold grade of gasoline. Prices have been converted from the local currency to U.S. dollars.; ; German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ).; Median;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0.79 2016 | yearly | 1992 - 2016 |
View Guatemala's Guatemala GT: Pump Price for Gasoline: USD per Liter from 1992 to 2016 in the chart:
Guatemala GT: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards
GT: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data was reported at 3.600 NA in 2017. This records a decrease from the previous number of 3.900 NA for 2016. GT: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data is updated yearly, averaging 4.000 NA from Dec 2007 to 2017, with 11 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 4.500 NA in 2010 and a record low of 3.600 NA in 2017. GT: Quality of Port Infrastructure: WEF: 1=Extremely Underdeveloped To 7=Well Developed and Efficient by International Standards data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Guatemala – Table GT.World Bank.WDI: Transportation. The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).; ; World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report.; Unweighted average;
| Last | Frequency | Range |
|---|---|---|
| 3.60 2017 | yearly | 2007 - 2017 |