Explore our Data

Afghanistan Policy and Institutions

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.50 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.50 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.50 NA in 2018 and a record low of 2.00 NA in 2008. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Policy and institutions for environmental sustainability assess the extent to which environmental policies foster the protection and sustainable use of natural resources and the management of pollution.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.50

2017
Previous

2.50

2016
Min

2.00

2008
Max

2.50

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.50

2017

2.50

2016

2.00

2008

2.50

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265234802

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

2.41

Variance

0.04

Standard deviation

0.20

Skewness

-1.92

Kurtosis

2.04

Coefficient variation

0.08

Median

2.50

Max
2017

2.50

Min
2008

2.00

Previous observation
2016

2.50

Last observation
2017

2.50

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.00 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.00 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 1.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.00 NA in 2018 and a record low of 1.50 NA in 2016. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Property rights and rule-based governance assess the extent to which private economic activity is facilitated by an effective legal system and rule-based governance structure in which property and contract rights are reliably respected and enforced.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.00

2017
Previous

1.50

2016
Min

1.50

2016
Max

2.00

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.00

2017

1.50

2016

1.50

2016

2.00

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265312802

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

1.55

Variance

0.02

Standard deviation

0.15

Skewness

3.32

Kurtosis

11.00

Coefficient variation

0.10

Median

1.50

Max
2017

2.00

Min
2016

1.50

Previous observation
2016

1.50

Last observation
2017

2.00

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.60 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.60 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.60 NA in 2018 and a record low of 2.20 NA in 2009. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. The public sector management and institutions cluster includes property rights and rule-based governance, quality of budgetary and financial management, efficiency of revenue mobilization, quality of public administration, and transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.60

2017
Previous

2.50

2016
Min

2.20

2009
Max

2.60

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.60

2017

2.50

2016

2.20

2009

2.60

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265328202

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

2.42

Variance

0.02

Standard deviation

0.13

Skewness

-0.71

Kurtosis

-0.60

Coefficient variation

0.05

Median

2.50

Max
2017

2.60

Min
2009

2.20

Previous observation
2016

2.50

Last observation
2017

2.60

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.50 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.50 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.50 NA in 2018 and a record low of 3.00 NA in 2009. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Quality of budgetary and financial management assesses the extent to which there is a comprehensive and credible budget linked to policy priorities, effective financial management systems, and timely and accurate accounting and fiscal reporting, including timely and audited public accounts.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

3.50

2017
Previous

3.50

2016
Min

3.00

2009
Max

3.50

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

3.50

2017

3.50

2016

3.00

2009

3.50

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265242602

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

3.36

Variance

0.05

Standard deviation

0.23

Skewness

-1.19

Kurtosis

-0.76

Coefficient variation

0.07

Median

3.50

Max
2017

3.50

Min
2009

3.00

Previous observation
2016

3.50

Last observation
2017

3.50

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.50 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.50 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.50 NA in 2018 and a record low of 2.00 NA in 2011. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Quality of public administration assesses the extent to which civilian central government staff is structured to design and implement government policy and deliver services effectively.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.50

2017
Previous

2.50

2016
Min

2.00

2011
Max

2.50

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.50

2017

2.50

2016

2.00

2011

2.50

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265297202

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

2.27

Variance

0.07

Standard deviation

0.26

Skewness

-0.21

Kurtosis

-2.44

Coefficient variation

0.11

Median

2.50

Max
2017

2.50

Min
2011

2.00

Previous observation
2016

2.50

Last observation
2017

2.50

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.50 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.50 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.50 NA in 2018 and a record low of 2.00 NA in 2008. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Social protection and labor assess government policies in social protection and labor market regulations that reduce the risk of becoming poor, assist those who are poor to better manage further risks, and ensure a minimal level of welfare to all people.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.50

2017
Previous

2.50

2016
Min

2.00

2008
Max

2.50

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.50

2017

2.50

2016

2.00

2008

2.50

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265320602

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

2.41

Variance

0.04

Standard deviation

0.20

Skewness

-1.92

Kurtosis

2.04

Coefficient variation

0.08

Median

2.50

Max
2017

2.50

Min
2008

2.00

Previous observation
2016

2.50

Last observation
2017

2.50

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.50 NA in Mar 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 2.67 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.67 NA in 2017 and a record low of 2.33 NA in 2008. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. The structural policies cluster includes trade, financial sector, and business regulatory environment.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.67

2017
Previous

2.67

2016
Min

2.33

2008
Max

2.67

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.67

2017

2.67

2016

2.33

2008

2.67

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265351502

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

2.53

Variance

0.01

Standard deviation

0.10

Skewness

-0.03

Kurtosis

0.41

Coefficient variation

0.04

Median

2.50

Max
2017

2.67

Min
2008

2.33

Previous observation
2016

2.67

Last observation
2017

2.67

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.50 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.50 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.00 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.50 NA in 2018 and a record low of 2.50 NA in 2009. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Trade assesses how the policy framework fosters trade in goods.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

3.50

2017
Previous

3.50

2016
Min

2.50

2009
Max

3.50

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

3.50

2017

3.50

2016

2.50

2009

3.50

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265359302

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

3.00

Variance

0.10

Standard deviation

0.32

Skewness

0.00

Kurtosis

0.42

Coefficient variation

0.11

Median

3.00

Max
2017

3.50

Min
2009

2.50

Previous observation
2016

3.50

Last observation
2017

3.50

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 2.00 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 2.00 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 2.00 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 2.50 NA in 2007 and a record low of 2.00 NA in 2018. Afghanistan’s AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector assess the extent to which the executive can be held accountable for its use of funds and for the results of its actions by the electorate and by the legislature and judiciary, and the extent to which public employees within the executive are required to account for administrative decisions, use of resources, and results obtained. The three main dimensions assessed here are the accountability of the executive to oversight institutions and of public employees for their performance, access of civil society to information on public affairs, and state capture by narrow vested interests.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

2.00

2017
Previous

2.00

2016
Min

2.00

2017
Max

2.50

2007
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

2.00

2017

2.00

2016

2.00

2017

2.50

2007

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265367102

Name

Afghanistan AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

2.05

Variance

0.02

Standard deviation

0.15

Skewness

3.32

Kurtosis

11.00

Coefficient variation

0.07

Median

2.00

Max
2007

2.50

Min
2017

2.00

Previous observation
2016

2.00

Last observation
2017

2.00

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data

Afghanistan AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

2007 - 2017 | Yearly | NA | World Bank

Afghanistan’s AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data was reported at 3.50 NA in Mar 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 3.50 NA for Mar 2017. Afghanistan’s AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data is updated yearly, averaging 3.50 NA from Mar 2007 to 2018, with 12 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.50 NA in 2018 and a record low of 3.00 NA in 2011. Afghanistan’s AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Afghanistan – Table AF.World Bank: Policy and Institutions. Building human resources assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect the access to and quality of health and education services, including prevention and treatment of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.; ; World Bank Group, CPIA database (http://www.worldbank.org/ida).; Unweighted average;

Last

3.50

2017
Previous

3.50

2016
Min

3.00

2011
Max

3.50

2017
Unit

NA

Frequency

yearly

Range

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018
Last Previous Min Max Unit Frequency Range

3.50

2017

3.50

2016

3.00

2011

3.50

2017

NA

yearly

2007 - 2017

Updated on 19 Apr 2018

View Afghanistan's AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High from 2007 to 2017 in the chart:

Afghanistan AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Series Details
Series ID

265273802

Name

Afghanistan AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High

Country

Afghanistan

Frequency

Yearly

Unit

NA

Status

Active

Source

World Bank

First Date

2007

Last Date

2017

Last Updated

19 Apr 2018

Statistics
Mean

3.27

Variance

0.07

Standard deviation

0.26

Skewness

-0.21

Kurtosis

-2.44

Coefficient variation

0.08

Median

3.50

Max
2017

3.50

Min
2011

3.00

Previous observation
2016

3.50

Last observation
2017

3.50

Number of Observations

11

Get This Data
AF: CPIA: Business Regulatory Environment Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Debt Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Economic Management Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Equity of Public Resource Use Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Financial Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Fiscal Policy Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Gender Equality Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Macroeconomic Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Policy and Institutions For Environmental Sustainability Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Property Rights and Rule-Based Governance Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Public Sector Management and Institutions Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Quality of Budgetary and Financial Management Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Quality of Public Administration Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Social Protection Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Structural Policies Cluster Average: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Trade Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: CPIA: Transparency: Accountability: and Corruption in The Public Sector Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA): Building Human Resources Rating: 1=Low To 6=High
AF: Law Mandates Equal Remuneration for Females & Males for Work of Equal Value: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Law Mandates Nondiscrimination Based on Gender in Hiring: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Law Mandates Paid or Unpaid Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Law Prohibits or Invalidates Child or Early Marriage: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Legislation Exists on Domestic Violence: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Methodology Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AF: Mothers are Guaranteed an Equivalent Position After Maternity Leave: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Nondiscrimination Clause Mentions Gender in the Constitution: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Nonpregnant and Nonnursing Women Can Do the Same Jobs as Men: 1=Yes; 0=No
AF: Overall Level of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AF: Periodicity and Timeliness Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
AF: Proportion of Seats Held by Women in National Parliaments
AF: Source Data Assessment of Statistical Capacity: Scale 0 - 100
CEIC Flex
Monthly metered access across all our data
20 Series Downloads Per Month
$39/per month
200 Series Downloads Per Month
$149/per month
500 Series Downloads Per Month
$299/per month
Buy Now
CEIC Unlimited
Unlimited access tailored to your data needs
Request a Demo